Saturday, May 8, 2010

Dem Bones – Look at Adjacent Joints to Solve Stubborn Injuries


Knowing the where it hurts is helpful, when it comes to allievatig injury, but not always. The phenomena of referred pain may play a role in the diagnosis and management of repetitive use injury. Referred pain is pain percieved at a site distant from the source of the pain. The typical example of referred pain is a heart attack. Individuals suffering a heart attack may describe crushing chest pain, but often the pain is percieved as left arm pain or left jaw pain. The source of the pain is the heart muscle, but the perception is that the arm or jaw hurts, this is “referred pain”.

The phenomona of referred pain is true for orthopedic problems as well as viseral problems. A client came to me for help with a chief compliaint of knee pain. After gathering the history, performing a clinical exam it became apparent that passive movement of the hip joint was restricted and passive movement of the hip joint while not allowing movement of the knee joint provoked the symptom of knee pain. After requesting assistance of the primary care physician to order a radiograph it showed signficant degernative joint disease of the hip, and a normal knee joint. This is an example of “referred pain”, the knee pain is precieved at a site distance from the source of the pain, the hip joint.

Referred pain tends to follow certain principals. The deeper the injured tissue the more likely the pain is percieved at a site distant from the source, as the heart is a very deep tissue, and the hip joint is also a deep structure they are often involved in “referred pain”. If the injured tissue is close to the surface like a tendon at the elbow (tennis elbow) it is less likely for the pain to be precieved at a site distant from the actual injury. Pain is referred from the center of the body outward, not from the periphery towards the center of the body. Referred pain from musculoskeletal tissues does not cross the mid-line of the body.

A similar but less recognized phenomenon is that the mechanical impairment causing the pain may be distant from the joint or area where pain is percieved. For example a common belief is that abnormal foot alignment and movement such as excessive pronation can lead to knee pain.

A recent published case report (Vaughin, DW 2009) described a 25 year old female runner who just prior to competing in her first Boston Marathon developed knee pain. The physical therapist performed all of the clinical examination procedures about the knee, but was unable to do provoke the symptoms or identify any impairment at the knee joint. Palpating all around the knee failed to elicit tenderness or symptoms. Continuing the clinical exam to look at adjacent joints of hip and pelvis provactive tests of the hip and pelvis demonstrated signficant asymmetrical limitations. The patient was treated with techniques to restore symmetry of alignment and movement of the pelvis and hip. After one treatment this patient was able to return to running without symptoms and she achieved her goal of completing the Boston Marathon.

Two different clients sought my assistance regarding shin splints. Palpation of the shin elicited the chief complaint shin pain in both patients. The shin pain was a local problem, not a referred pain problem. However examination of the foot and ankle failed to demonstrate abnormal foot alignment or any signs of excessive pronation in both patients. One patient did demonstrate impairment of the hip on the affected side; the gluteal muscles were relatively long and weak. When she ran the affected leg would frequently cross the mid-line of the body when the foot struck the ground. After pointing out to her the form fault of crossing the mid-line with the affected foot, she was instructed to conciously correct this fault and not allow the foot strike to cross the mid-line of the body. When she ran in this manner she was able to run without shin pain. This was followed up with remedial strengthening exercies to improve the muscular endurance of the gluteal muscles. The second patient partcipated in slow motion video analysis running and the symptomatic leg rotated inwardly to a much greater degree in comparision to the non injured leg. She was instructed to conciously correct this fault and to laterally rotate the affected leg when walking and running and she was able to allievate the shin pain. Again this was followed with remedial strenthening exerices for the muscles responsible for lateral rotation. Both of these cases are examples of pain being related to alignment and movement issues at joints distant from where the pain is percieved.

The old gospel song “Dem Bones” comes to mind with the leg bone connected to the knee bone, and the knee bone connected to the thigh bone, and the thigh bone connected to the hip bone.
With repititive use injuries the question needs to be asked is the pain local and/or referred. Additionally the question needs to be asked is the abnormal mechanics local and/or referred.

Bottom line:
• If you have an injury which is not responding to the obvious standard treatments ask is this problem a local and/or referred problem.
• Look back up the body towards the trunk as a possible source of the pain
• Look back up the body or down to the feet as a possible mechanical impairment being the cause of the problem.

Damien Howell PT, MS, OCS – www.damienhowellpt.com – 804-965-9990

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Ed Moran, part 2


Photo by TriDuo.com
With a time of 14:13 four-time William and Mary All-American Ed Moran broke the Virginia state 5K record by five seconds April 17th at the inaugural Run the D.O.G. [Duke of Gloucester] Street 5K in Williamsburg. Moran here is rounding the curve in front of the Governor's Palace of Colonial Williamsburg. The course then went past the Capitol Building for an historic final half mile up Duke of Gloucester Street to the finish line near Merchants Square. There were 345 finishers in the 5K event, benefiting Avalon of Williamsburg, the women's shelter.




Moran Runs 14:13 for Virginia State Record at the Run the D.O.G. Street 5K

By Rick Platt

Last Saturday was an historic day for Williamsburg runners for multiple reasons. The inaugural Run the D.O.G. [Duke of Gloucester] Street 5K featured the first competitive event ever allowed through the streets of Colonial Williamsburg, with runners passing in front of the Governor’s Palace and the Capitol Building before a final half-mile finish up Duke of Gloucester Street. The 5K was also the first Colonial Road Runners Grand Prix race to utilize a computerized chip timing system, thanks to a recent purchase of the “Jaguar” timing system by the race organizers and race director Jim Elder of Colonial Sports.

And it was historic because race favorite Ed Moran met his goals of breaking the all-time Colonial Road Runners 5K record and the all-time Virginia state 5K record.

Moran, a four-time All-American while at William and Mary (graduating in 2003), is an assistant coach with the W&M men’s cross country and track programs, and a current MBA student at the W&M Mason School of Business. He competes for Nike, and is coached by W&M men’s head track and cross country coach Alex Gibby. He won the gold medal in the 5,000 meters at the 2007 Pan-American Games, and was fourth in the U.S. Olympic Trials in 2008 in the 10,000 meters. On the track he has run 13:20.35 for 5,000 meters and 27:43.13 for 10,000 meters.

The race started on Prince George Street adjacent to the W&M Barnes and Noble bookstore. The focused Moran was totally clear of the large field (there were 345 official finishers in the 5K) within a block, before a left on Armistead Avenue brought the runners to James Blair Drive and a loop around the W&M University Center and football stadium. By the time Moran exited the campus, at Scotland Street and Richmond Road, he was on record pace with an opening 4:30 mile. He kept that blistering pace down Scotland Street and into Colonial Williamsburg for the second half. Sprinting up what Franklin D. Roosevelt called the “most historic avenue in all America,” Moran crossed the finish line near the Bruton Parish Church in 14:13, bettering the previous mark by five seconds. That record was 14:18 by Mark Donahue at the 1996 Busch Gardens Drachen Fire 5K Run. Virginia state records must be set on courses certified to exacting USATF measurement standards, and the Run the D.O.G. Street course is certified (VA-10013-RT). Those records have been kept for over 30 years.

Moran also broke the previous all-time CRR record for open men by 23 seconds, the previous record 14:37 by Matt Lane at the 2001 Vineyards of Williamsburg 5K Run. Lane also was a former W&M track and cross country star, having earned 11 All-American honors while at W&M. And lastly Moran broke the all-time CRR mark for the men’s 25-29 age group by almost a full minute, the previous record 15:10 by Patrick Phillips of Greensboro, NC at the 1997 Queens Lake 5K Run.

Moran was almost 1 ¾ minutes ahead of second place Matt Chandler, 22, of Williamsburg (15:55), a W&M senior. Third place went to Bruton High track coach Mark Tompkins, 34, of Williamsburg (16:00), with W&M law student Alex Grout, two seconds further back (16:02).

Another of the remarkable performances of the day came from Lafayette High freshman Kurtis Steck, age 15, who was fifth overall in 16:13. Last November, Steck broke the Virginia state record for the men’s 10-14 age group with a time of 16:42. Now age 15, he continues to improve.

In the women’s race Sarrah Hadiji, 21, of Williamsburg, a W&M junior, ran 18:44 to finish ahead of Lafayette High sophomore Heidi Peterson (19:01) and five-time CRR women’s Grand Prix champion Jennifer Quarles, 38, of Williamsburg (19:44). The top three men and women received prize money in the amounts of $100-50-25, although high school (Peterson) and NCAA-eligible runners are not allowed to accept any cash awards.

Hadiji had run with the W&M cross country and track teams as a freshman and sophomore, but is now running on her own. She competed in high school at W.T. Woodson in Fairfax, where she was the Virginia state champion two straight years at the 3,200-meter distance. She also finished sixth in the Nike Outdoor Nationals, earning high-school All-American honors in 2007. The Run the D.O.G. 5K was her first race in almost a year. Medical school at Sheffield University in the United Kingdom is planned after her 2011 W&M graduation.

The Run the D.O.G. race was a “Healthy Heart, Healthy Minds, for a Healthy Community” event, and was part of a two-day-long festival to support Avalon, the women’s shelter in Williamsburg. Friday evening had a Dave Matthews Tribute Band Concert at W&M Hall. Saturday morning started at 7:30 a.m. with a children and family one mile fun run out-and-back on Duke of Gloucester Street, with 45 finishers. The weekly Farmer’s Market was in the next block after the finish line, followed by Avalon entertainment in Merchants Square with three bands through the day, numerous vendor booths, and a “Walk-A-Mile in Her Shoes” competition for men at 12 noon.


Saturday, April 17, 2010

Run The DOG 5K - Moran Sets State 5K Record

Run the D.O.G. Street 5K

Duke of Gloucester Street , Colonial Williamsburg , Williamsburg , Virginia

Saturday, April 17, 2010

A Colonial Road Runners Grand Prix Event

Information from Rick Platt (757-229-7375, rickplatt@juno.com)

Men Overall

1. Ed Moran, 28 Williamsburg 14:13**

2. Matt Chandler, 22 Williamsburg 15:55

3. Mark Tompkins, 34 Williamsburg 16:00

** [all-time Virginia state 5K record for open men, old record 14:18 by Mark Donahue, June 1, 1996 at the Busch Gardens Drachen Fire 5K Run in Williamsburg, VA]

** [all-time Colonial Road Runners 5K record for open men, old record 14:37 by Matt Lane, age 23, Williamsburg, VA at 2001 Vineyards of Williamsburg 5K Run in Williamsburg]

** [all-time Colonial Road Runners 5K record for men age 25-29, old record 15:10 by Patrick Phillips, 25, of Greensboro, NC at 1997 Queens Lake 5K Run in Williamsburg]

Women Overall

1. Sarrah Hadiji, 21 Williamsburg 18:44

2. Heidi Peterson, 16 Williamsburg 19:01

3. Jennifer Quarles, 38 Williamsburg 19:44

Ed Moran, a 4-time All-American while at William and Mary (graduating in 2003), is an assistant coach with the W&M men’s cross country and track programs, and a current MBA student at the W&M Mason School of Business. He competes for Nike, and is coached by W&M men’s head track and cross country coach Alex Gibby. He won the gold medal in the 5,000 meters at the 2007 Pan-American Games, and was fourth in the U.S. Olympic Trials in 2008 in the 10,000 meters.

Saturday morning at the historic Run the D.O.G. [Duke of Gloucester Street] 5K through the streets of the College of Wiliam and Mary, the City of Williamsburg , and Colonial Williamsburg, Moran had an historic day himself, breaking the all-time Virginia state 5K record for open men, and bettering the previous mark by five seconds. That record was 14:18 by Mark Donahue at the 1996 Busch Gardens Drachen Fire 5K Run in Williamsburg .

Virginia records must be set on courses certified to USATF measurement standards, and the Run the D.O.G. Street race is certified (VA-10013-RT), and the course was run as measured.

Moran also broke the previous all-time Colonial Road Runners record for open men by 23 seconds, the previous record 14:37 by Matt Lane at the 2001 Vineyards of Williamsburg 5K Run. Lane also was a former W&M track and cross country star, having earned 11 All-American honors while at W&M.

And lastly Moran broke the all-time CRR mark for the men’s 25-29 age group by almost a full minute, the previous record 15:10 by Patrick Phillips of Greensboro , NC at the 1997 Queens Lake 5K Run.

Moran was almost 1 ¾ minutes ahead of second place Matt Chandler, 22, of Williamsburg (15:55), a W&M senior. Third place went to Bruton High track coach Mark Tompkins, 34, of Williamsburg (16:00), with W&M law student Alex Grout, two seconds further back (16:02).

One of the most remarkable performances of the day came from Lafayette High freshman Kurtis Steck, age 15, who was fifth overall in 16:13. Last November, Steck broke the Virginia state record for the men’s 10-14 age group with a time of 16:42. Now age 15, he continues to improve.

In the women’s race Sarrah Hadiji, 21, of Williamsburg, a W&M junior, ran 18:44 to finish ahead of Lafayette High sophomore Heidi Peterson (19:01) and 5-time Colonial Road Runners women’s Grand Prix champion Jennifer Quarles, 38, of Williamsburg (19:44).

Saturday, April 10, 2010

Creditability of Shoe Selection Based on Foot Print Shape and Injury Risk



© Damien Howell PT, MS, OCS – www.damienhowellpt.com – 804-965-9990

Running magazines and internet shoe sales sites often recommend that the shape of the wet foot print should be used to determine which type of running shoe should be selected. There is a common belief that a foot print reflecting low arch (flat feet) should select shoes designed for “motion control”. Motion control shoes are presumed to control excessive motion which occurs in individuals with low arch flat feet. Individuals with foot print suggesting a high arch is presumed to have rigid inflexible feet that under pronate, thus striking the ground with greater force. Cushioned shoes are recommended for those individuals, in order to allow more pronation and to attenuate forces. Individuals with foot prints assessed as average have arch height somewhere between the flat feet and high arch feet. The prevailing recommendation for these individuals is a neutral shoes or as some shoe companies describe shoes designed for stability.

A large amount of the advertising and blogging suggests that it is important to select the correct shoe design that matches the individual’s foot in order to prevent injury. However there is less than a dozen scientific studies which have examined running shoe design or selection influencing the incidence of running injuries and all of these studies have major methodological flaws.

A recent study (Knapuk, J.J. 2009) prospectively examined whether or not using a foot print assessment technique influenced injury risk during US Army Basic Combat Training. After foot examinations, including foot print test, basic recruits were randomized into a control group or an experimental group.

All subjects in the control group were given a neutral stability shoe. Subjects in the experimental group were given a shoe design based on the results of the foot print test. Subjects with flat feet were given a motion control shoe, subjects with neutral arch shape were given a neutral shoe, and subjects with high arch were given a shoe designed to provide cushioning and allow motion. The investigators were able to control for other previously know injury risk factors (age, fitness level, smoking).

The results were surprising. There was little difference in injury risk between the control group and the experimental group. The results of study demonstrated that selecting running shoes based on a foot print test did not reduce the risk of injury.

Comparing subjects in the extremes of the experimental group that is very high arch or very flat feet with the control subjects, the injury risk was slightly higher in the experimental group. This indicated that even with extreme foot shapes selecting running shoes based on foot print test did not reduce injury risk, and may have slightly increased risk of injury. The results of this study are disheartening, in that, there is a simple elegance to the idea that equipment can be designed to match the anatomical structure of an individual and this should have a positive result
in terms of function and injury risk. It seems logical that if sports equipment can be custom designed to match the structure of an individual it should result in better performance and less injury. The results of this study raise question regarding this belief.

In this study the shoes provided to the experimental group were from five different shoe companies. The classification of running shoe design into motion control, cushioning, or neutral stability shoes is determined by the manufacture. There is no independent third party to assure that claims made by shoe manufactures are accurate. There is no independent third party to test whether the shoe manufacture’s statement that a size 9 shoes is actually a size 9. I have seen two pairs of shoes both size 9 shoes from reputable manufactures that were distinctly different in length/size. Perhaps the professed differences in shoe design, material, and structure are not real or significant. Alternatively perhaps there are real differences in materials and shoe designs between the 3 categories of shoes but these differences do not affect injury risk.
Bottom line:
  • When it comes to selecting running shoes “buyer be ware”
  • Factors other than shoe design and selection may have greater influence on injury risk, such as training load, prior fitness level, manner in which you run.

Damien Howell PT, MS, OCS
Physiotherapy Associates Richmond West End Clinic
8909 West Broad St.
Suite F
Richmond, Va. 23294
804-965-9990
Damien@DamienHowellPT.com